"Marvel Cinematic Universe" News & Discussion, Part 5 (Spoilers)

[Yojimbo]

Well, they definitely revealing more about the Disney+ titles at D23. I think they'll refrain from talking about it at SDCC. In 2017 I think, they did reveal some of the new actors in Ant-Man and The Wasp and gushed about the upcoming movies. Hmm, maybe the same here, intro a some of the new actors in Black Widow then show a partial line up of movies - basically confirm the ones we know about, but show a fuller line up at D23 with some surprises of what else is in the pipeline. Maybe tease what the theme for the next saga/phase will be. Pretty sure they will take the time to honor Stan Lee.

 

[RoyalRubble]

If I had to guess, I think they would reveal Phase 4 plans here at SDCC, and the D23 Expo would focus mostly on the Disney+ stuff (i.e., the Marvel TV shows, not the theatrical releases). But I guess we'll see.

 

[reflection01]

If I had to guess, I think they would reveal Phase 4 plans here at SDCC, and the D23 Expo would focus mostly on the Disney+ stuff (i.e., the Marvel TV shows, not the theatrical releases). But I guess we'll see.

I think the same although I’ll add that they may reveal when the FF will join the MCU at D23. They’ll officially be welcoming Fox into the fold.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[the greenman]

I think the same although I’ll add that they may reveal when the FF will join the MCU at D23. They’ll officially be welcoming Fox into the fold.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I don't think we'll get any FOX characters this turn. However, Deadpool 3 will be addressed, and I think Reynolds will be there. Supposedly, FOX will release that and probably Disney will step back from it.

Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk

 

[brodie999]

I don't think we'll get any FOX characters this turn. However, Deadpool 3 will be addressed, and I think Reynolds will be there. Supposedly, FOX will release that and probably Disney will step back from it.

Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk

Feige did say they've mapped out a 5-year Phase 4 plan which doesn't include the X-Men. He didn't say anything about the FF. So they might do another fake-out. Only to reveal the new MCU FF reboot at Comic-Con. They've done a pretty good job with Civil War in 2014.

 

[Yojimbo]

Far From Home spoilers in this article but to sum the tidbit up, while a story for the 3rd Spider-Man movie isn't chosen yet, when asked if it were up to him on choosing the next villain - Watts said he would pick Kraven.

 

[the greenman]

Far From Home spoilers in this article but to sum the tidbit up, while a story for the 3rd Spider-Man movie isn't chosen yet, when asked if it were up to him on choosing the next villain - Watts said he would pick Kraven.

Honestly, the solo film idea only sounds good for me to flesh him out before he meets Spider-Man. An hour & a half set-up film where he is the best of hunters and heard of a Black Panther but, is presented with the monetary gift from cuz Chameleon to hunt Spider-Man.

Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk

 

[brodie999]

With Marvel Studios having a 90-minute panel at Hail H on the 20th, this'll be the longest panel in history. It also gives us enough time to reveal the next 5 years of MCU movies. With Sony balling out of Comic-Con, hopefully, this means Marvel will announce the MCU Spider-Man threequel themselves.

 

[Frontier]

Far From Home spoilers in this article but to sum the tidbit up, while a story for the 3rd Spider-Man movie isn't chosen yet, when asked if it were up to him on choosing the next villain - Watts said he would pick Kraven.

Of course it would be Kraven, he's like the only really big Lee/Ditko villain that hasn't been in the movies yet .

 

[SweetShop209]

Spider-Man rights could revert to Sony if 'Far From Home' 'fails to make $1 billion'

Marvel could lose the MCU rights to the webslinger.

www.yahoo.com

Here is some interesting news.

 

[brodie999]

Spider-Man rights could revert to Sony if 'Far From Home' 'fails to make $1 billion'

Marvel could lose the MCU rights to the webslinger.

www.yahoo.com

Here is some interesting news.

Yeah, I know. Overseeing the third movie might mean Marvel might regain the full rights to Spider-Man if it hits a billion which is looking increasingly likely.

 

[Gold Guy]

I'm skeptical. I mean, a billion? That's just such a high mark, and seems way too demanding.

 

[reflection01]

I'm skeptical. I mean, a billion? That's just such a high mark, and seems way too demanding.

Seems like it but it’s only $120M more than Homecoming and less than eight MCU films. But it seems like a dirty trick by Sony considering it’s considerably more than their last two Spidey films made.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Freddy]

Seems like it but it’s only $120M more than Homecoming and less than eight MCU films. But it seems like a dirty trick by Sony considering it’s considerably more than their last two Spidey films made.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

It's more than any of their Spidey movies have done.

 

[Neo Ultra Mike]

It is currently at 600+ million and considering that Stuber and Crawl aren't going to do anything this weekend it should easily be able worldwide to get another 200 something million this weekend to get 800+ and even with competition of Lion King 2019 and Hobbs and Shaw in the coming weeks the fact it does have positive reviews and replayability should be able to score it a billion. I mean Captain Marvel made over a billion so I don't think it's too out there for this movie to do so.

Still I have a lot of doubts about how authentic that deal is. Yeah we do know that the original deal between Sony and Marvel was for 5 pictures for Spider Man to appear in the MCU and after that they'd have to renegioate and we do know Sony wants to keep the rights to Spider Man to make their own Spider Man related movies. However the team at the MCU isn't stupid and wouldn't have put so much time into making these movies and making this second one that DEMANDS a third MCU Spider Man film if they thought there was any chance they couldn't make that movie. And though Spider Man films are a huge brand they've yet to clear that billion mark and though the July release date is solid it's not as solid as some of the other release dates for getting to that high a number. So I don't think Marvel would take such a risk with that stipulation even if/when this movie gets to a billion.

 

[the greenman]

It is currently at 600+ million and considering that Stuber and Crawl aren't going to do anything this weekend it should easily be able worldwide to get another 200 something million this weekend to get 800+ and even with competition of Lion King 2019 and Hobbs and Shaw in the coming weeks the fact it does have positive reviews and replayability should be able to score it a billion. I mean Captain Marvel made over a billion so I don't think it's too out there for this movie to do so.

Still I have a lot of doubts about how authentic that deal is. Yeah we do know that the original deal between Sony and Marvel was for 5 pictures for Spider Man to appear in the MCU and after that they'd have to renegioate and we do know Sony wants to keep the rights to Spider Man to make their own Spider Man related movies. However the team at the MCU isn't stupid and wouldn't have put so much time into making these movies and making this second one that DEMANDS a third MCU Spider Man film if they thought there was any chance they couldn't make that movie. And though Spider Man films are a huge brand they've yet to clear that billion mark and though the July release date is solid it's not as solid as some of the other release dates for getting to that high a number. So I don't think Marvel would take such a risk with that stipulation even if/when this movie gets to a billion.

Disney/Marvel allows Sony that release date. Remember when they were making this deal, Disney bumped "Pirates" for Homecoming in July.

Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk

 

[brodie999]

It is currently at 600+ million and considering that Stuber and Crawl aren't going to do anything this weekend it should easily be able worldwide to get another 200 something million this weekend to get 800+ and even with competition of Lion King 2019 and Hobbs and Shaw in the coming weeks the fact it does have positive reviews and replayability should be able to score it a billion. I mean Captain Marvel made over a billion so I don't think it's too out there for this movie to do so.

Still I have a lot of doubts about how authentic that deal is. Yeah we do know that the original deal between Sony and Marvel was for 5 pictures for Spider Man to appear in the MCU and after that they'd have to renegioate and we do know Sony wants to keep the rights to Spider Man to make their own Spider Man related movies. However the team at the MCU isn't stupid and wouldn't have put so much time into making these movies and making this second one that DEMANDS a third MCU Spider Man film if they thought there was any chance they couldn't make that movie. And though Spider Man films are a huge brand they've yet to clear that billion mark and though the July release date is solid it's not as solid as some of the other release dates for getting to that high a number. So I don't think Marvel would take such a risk with that stipulation even if/when this movie gets to a billion.

Actually, this rumour is completely false. It's unlikely Sony would end their partnership with Marvel even if the movie "only" made $900 millio, which won't happen because it's likely to hit $1 billion. Marvel needs Spider-Man in the MCU to help Sony keep making money,

 

[reflection01]

It seems ridiculous because the current deal seems to be working well for both sides.




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

 

[Yojimbo]

Rumor is Kraven might be Wakandan.

We Love You 3000 tour in nine cities between SDCC and D23.

 

[brodie999]

July 15th:

Thor 4 has been greenlit with Taika Waititi back as director.

New Secret Facebook Pages are possibly confirming the MCU X-Men reboot, Avengers Vs. X-Men movie, Dark Avengers, Young Avengers and Moon Knight.