Feige confirmed Ms. Marvel will also appear in upcoming movies.
Meh, so long as they give her own movie and let MCU Captain Marvel Stays free of that non-relationship.
Last edited:
Feige confirmed Ms. Marvel will also appear in upcoming movies.
I don't think Sony ever owned Spider-Woman at all. I think especially since she was a secret agent she was kinda disconnected from Spider-Man.The thing going on between Disney and Sony thus Spider-Man leaving the MCU. The thing that really sucks about it for me at least is because now we most likely won't see Jessica Drew (Spider-Woman) with the Avenger or hanging out with Carol Danvers in the MCU. Well, I pretty sure Sony owns the rights to Jess I might be wrong though.
Oh, so that's how it is. Ay caramba! These companies need to get things worked out.Marvel owns the name Jessica Drew along with her origin, while Sony owns the name Spider-Woman her costume and her powerset. Seems like you can have one without the other coming to an agreement.
Which probably means we won't be seeing them for a while
In Blade? Disney+? The Hulu shows? The possibilities are endless
8/25: The implication seems to be the Marvel Studios side of things, not Marvel TV. But Blade seems possible. Maybe even the Strange sequel.Which probably means we won't be seeing them for a while.
In Blade? Disney+? The Hulu shows? The possibilities are endless.
Fueling the "Young Avengers" rumors even more
Before I read the article I thought it was her feminine sexuality. The actual issue was even worseKristen Stewart reveals she was told to tone down her sexuality if she ever wanted a Marvel role.
I wonder if they were looking for a specific role...if it's around GoTG, the only thing I figure they could've been casting for would be Ant-Man or Dr. Strange.Robert Pattinson reveals he met with Marvel around the time Guardians of the Galaxy came out but nothing came of it.
My thoughts exactly.Before I read the article I thought it was her feminine sexuality. The actual issue was even worse.
To be honest I could kind of see this from Ike Perlmutter. he seems like that kind of old-school conservative from what I've read about him.
I could kinda seem him being considered for Stephen Strange if they couldn't get Cumberbatch at the time.I wonder if they were looking for a specific role...if it's around GoTG, the only thing I figure they could've been casting for would be Ant-Man or Dr. Strange.
To be honest I could kind of see this from Ike Perlmutter. he seems like that kind of old-school conservative from what I've read about him.
I can understand not doing Doom as the first major villain since that was the case in the last cinematic iterations of the FF...that way you can build up to himRumor is Dr. Doom won't be a villain, but not heroic either, when he appears in the Fantastic Four movie. But big plans for him nonetheless.
Kristen Stewart reveals she was told to tone down her sexuality if she ever wanted a Marvel role.
The problem with most of the main comicbook films were using the same tropes:I can understand not doing Doom as the first major villain since that was the case in the last cinematic iterations of the FF...that way you can build up to him.
Well, it's a formula that works for the most part depending on the execution.The problem with most of the main comicbook films were using the same tropes:
Hero origin
Love interest
Arch Enemy
Some of the films are trying to change things up abit. Black Panther did a little as well, as Ant-Man. FOX relied too heavily on using Magneto and Dr. Doom. They originally said they were gonna use Mole Man in Fan4stic.
Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk
The problem with most of the main comicbook films were using the same tropes:
Hero origin
Love interest
Arch Enemy
Some of the films are trying to change things up abit. Black Panther did a little as well, as Ant-Man. FOX relied too heavily on using Magneto and Dr. Doom. They originally said they were gonna use Mole Man in Fan4stic.
Sent from my LGMP260 using Tapatalk