Superpan
Member
Pretty much all of 80's X-Men. He left them in the early issues of X-Factor, to be more specific.Wow, I never knew that! When did this happen? What series? What issues? Who wrote it?
Pretty much all of 80's X-Men. He left them in the early issues of X-Factor, to be more specific.Wow, I never knew that! When did this happen? What series? What issues? Who wrote it?
Pretty much all of 80's X-Men. He left them in the early issues of X-Factor, to be more specific.
Thanks guys. Between the beginning of X--Factor and The Fall of The Mutants is right around when I was first getting into comics and The X-Men, but my reading was inconsistently spotty, so I either never read about any of that or had totally forgotten it. Definitely sounds like one of Claremont's many story threads he likes to throw out there, but never expanded on or just abandoned.
Yeah, it sounds like they really didn't have a good idea of what to do with Cyclops in this series. When they were promoting the show they said his big arc was getting over his grief and getting back to being a hero, but it never happened. He started his tenure sitting in the back of the Black Bird, and in the three part finale he was still sitting in the back of the Black Bird, with Iceman giving him a dirty look. He never overcame his flaws and thus had no growth, and that's not good storytelling. And as Monte points out we also saw Cycke was mixed up with Apocalypse in yet another bad future, which makes it even harder to believe that they would allow him to become a legitimate hero when they wouldn't even let him be a legitimate hero in flashbacks. Magneto and Mr. Sinister came off as more noble, heroic characters than Cycke did in this series, and when a genocidal terrorist and crazy sadistic geneticist come off as more noble and heroic than one of the main protagonists, that's not a good sign.Monte said:Y'know, thinking about it, this bit makes me REALLY skeptical of how well cyclops would turn out. I mean sure they say they would let cyclops a hero and born leader, but it feels like they are building him up just to tear him down all over again. I mean, Season 1 basically showed us that cyclops can not even function without jean, and yet, after she has returned and he his regaining his life, its only THEN that he starts to pin for someone else? Ya pining for Emma after going through such an episode with Jean and getting her back probably would not earn him a lot of points... not to mention i can't help but think it would be wolverine of all people who will be the one to confront him about it (once again, make others look bad so wolverine can look good)...
Furtharmore their is the issue of his future with Apocalypse. We saw in the future that Cyclops was to eventually become one of Apocalypse men along side sinister. Considering how we would likely see things come to the brink of Apocalypse's victory before they manage to thwart him and avoid a horrible future, I can't help but think this means we would see Cyclops get tempted by the dark side... hence again, being built up just to be broken down... and wolverine will probably play a key role in making him see the light again.
Anyway its amazing how both the 90s show and this show Jean have the same uniform yet this version looks so much better on her than the 90s one.The same goes for Angel and Rogue
Some more shots of Jean -
Why would her character design in the show look different from her character design for the show?I am pretty sure Jean would look different in the actual show .The show is not as stylized as most recent Marvel shows
Heh... come to think of it... What exactly could actually cut off wolverine's hand?... An adamantium is not exactly easy to cut through and sever the hand.
Well techncially they may have been talking about the series as a whole and we never got to see season 2 and thus him return to being a hero... however, what they said was still not accurate. Cyclops never got over his grief and grew; the source of his grief was just removed. He was technically the same exact person at the start as we be later; only difference is that one scott had Jean to hold his hand while the other didn't. If he lost jean again he would turn into the pile of mush he was all over again. That's not character growth but really just showing us different sides of the same character. The most evolution he made was becoming slightly less rage filled, but I feel like he never really seemed to ever get over Jean and move on.Yeah, it sounds like they really didn't have a good idea of what to do with Cyclops in this series. When they were promoting the show they said his big arc was getting over his grief and getting back to being a hero, but it never happened. He started his tenure sitting in the back of the Black Bird, and in the three part finale he was still sitting in the back of the Black Bird, with Iceman giving him a dirty look. He never overcame his flaws and thus had no growth, and that's not good storytelling.
I never read Age Of Apocalypse myself (never got into it as a kid) but I believe that Wolverine was supposed to take out one of Cyclops' eyes while Cyke blasted off his hand.Heh... come to think of it... What exactly could actually cut off wolverine's hand?... An adamantium is not exactly easy to cut through and sever the hand.
Ah I see flesh toned ,no wonder she looked silly in the 90s show
Heh... come to think of it... What exactly could actually cut off wolverine's hand?... An adamantium is not exactly easy to cut through and sever the hand.
I never read Age Of Apocalypse myself (never got into it as a kid) but I believe that Wolverine was supposed to take out one of Cyclops' eyes while Cyke blasted off his hand.
Eh the writers were probably using an interpretation of wolverine before his healing factor became so insane. It think in earlier incarnations, wolverine was much less invulnerable... Cuts, broken bones, internal injuries, and diseae he can handle, but a severed limb is beyond him.So it's feasible that Wolverine could lose body parts if it was done at the joint, but I'm no doctor so I can't say exactly how accurate a mutant with a healing factor that can grow him back from a skeleton and indestructible bones can lose a body
heh, is that so... I wonder if Cyclops can even do that. I mean if I understood correctly a concussive blast should not be good at all for severing a limb, much less one that is covered in adamantium.
I'm actually okay with that. That's better than just Wolverine. Don't know who Armor is, so I'm looking forward to finding out ...
While that may be the case, the Cyclops I'm familiar with is the more than capable leader from X-Men: Evolution, Astonishing X-Men (Joss Whedon's run, haven't read any other AXM) and the first 12 issues of Ultimate X-Men (haven't read the rest yet)..
heh, is that so... I wonder if Cyclops can even do that. I mean if I understood correctly a concussive blast should not be good at all for severing a limb, much less one that is covered in adamantium
Eh the writers were probably using an interpretation of wolverine before his healing factor became so insane. It think in earlier incarnations, wolverine was much less invulnerable... Cuts, broken bones, internal injuries, and diseae he can handle, but a severed limb is beyond him.