ESE150
Member
...So you didn't see Peter defeating the villain at the end of each ep coming?I love how you call this show "predictable" and say it only follows a villain-of-the-week method.
You're right. You sure proved me wrong by NOT giving a single argument to back up you claim.And just to prove a point, I'm going to explain how wrong this part of your post is:
SSM has just as tight a continuity, if not more organized of one, as the 90's series.
Right. I'm sure that having Spidey battle the bad guy 2-4 times in the same episode under the same circumstances does advance the plot. So does having Gwen get mad at Peter and not talk to him, just to have them reconciliate 3 episodes later. And I'm sure that the pointless scenes with Flash do advance the plot, too.Clearly, you aren't even PAYING ATTENTION to those "random events", since those are events that advance the overall plot of the series and aren't just there to affect a single episode.
Natural? Come on. You think that the fact that ALL of the villains have had history together before getting superpowers (and remember, this is set in NEW YORK) is believable?Again, every episode of SSM adds something to the storyline and the links between SSM's episodes seem natural (plus, there has been a few clever moments).
Read above.And, as far as I can tell, the only villain origin that felt "forced" was Electro's.
Children's cartoons usually don't use tight continuity. Well, they do at times, but their continuity isn't as bold. SpideyTAS even had an entire season dealing with Spidey's unstable powers, which required you to watch most episodes to understand the story.I love how you forgot during this part that the 90's show was clearly intended to appeal to younger kids as well.
Also Semper stated in a interview that the show was supposed to be appealing to kids AND adults.
Now you're just making stuff up, aren't you? SpideyTAS was a low-budget cartoon because Marvel was going into bankrupcy when the show was being produced. Now? Marvel is more profitable than ever, thanks to the movies.The art style is because they simply CANNOT AFFORD the kind of realistic style that you want. If you really want it for this series, go donate a few million dollars to Marvel.
And the art style has NOTHING to do with budget.
No, but it makes it hard take serious the stories.And really, a cartoony animation style doesn't eliminate the possibility of mature themes.
And I have yet to see anything implying that this show is supposed to appeal to adults, rather than just kids.
Funny you mention Teen Titans, considering that the producers stated that it was intended to appeal young kids.Teen Titans had a cartoony animation style, and it had incredibly dark episodes amongst the kiddy ones.
Here's the quote:
Justice League is awesome and awesome Samurai Jack is and we buy a lot of anime shows that're great, but those shows really are directed more towards the nine to fourteen age group and the six and seven and eight year olds, were not gelling with the Justice League and some of the more of the fanboy shows...The main mission was making a good superhero show for kids. Now if the fanboys happen to like the Teen Titans also, that's great, but that was not our mission.
Oh, but I did.Overall, I feel like you didn't even watch past the first two episodes.